BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                    SB 570
                                                                    Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   July 14, 1999

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS 
                              Carole Migden, Chairwoman

                       SB 570 (Alarcon) - As Amended: 4/27/99 

          Policy Committee:                              Public  
          SafetyVote:  6-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local  
          Program:YesReimbursable:          Yes

           SUMMARY  :

          This bill increases penalties for disrupting or threatening  
          school personnel on school grounds.  Specifically, this bill: 

          1)Creates a 1, 2, or 3-year sentence enhancement for  
            communicating a threat against a principal, teacher, school  
            board member, or other school personnel. 

          2)Increases the penalty for interfering with any school activity  
            - by anyone over 16 years of age - as follows:

             a)   For a first conviction, a person can be fined a minimum  
               of $500 and/or jailed for up to one year.  (Current law  
               sets the minimum fine at $100 and/or jail time for up to  
               six months.) 

             b)   For a second conviction, a person can be fined $1,000  
               and must serve at least 10 days, up to one year.

             c)   Upon a third conviction, a person can be fined for  
               $1,000 and must serve at least 90 days, up to a year.

          3)Authorizes the court to grant probation or suspend the  
            sentence.

          4)Increases the penalty for any parent or guardian who disrupts  
            classwork or extracurricular activities.  The penalties would  
            be similar to the scheme in 1), above. 

          5)States legislative intent that teachers, administrators, and  
            aides report missing children to a law enforcement agency in a  








                                                                    SB 570
                                                                    Page  2

            timely manner.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :

          Unknown GF costs, potentially in excess of $200,000.  In  
          1997-98, 513 persons were committed to state prison for  
          terrorist threats.  If two percent of this number made threats  
          against school personnel, annual costs would be about $220,000  
          beginning in one or two years when the enhancement would begin,  
          increasing annually for three years to the extent offenders  
          received a two or three-year enhancement.
           

          COMMENTS  :

           1)Rationale.  According to the author, "recent incidents have  
            shown us that all too often violence is used or threatened  
            when conflicts arise at schools.  A principal in my district  
            was recently beaten and another threatened.  This bill  
            increases penalties against those who bring violence to school  
            campuses and sends the message that violence in our schools  
            will not be tolerated."

           1)Should threats against school personnel result in longer  
            sentences than threats against other persons?   As noted in the  
            Public Safety Committee analysis, the author refers to a  
            principal who was beaten. That crime, however, could be  
            prosecuted as a felony under current law and the offender sent  
            to prison for three, four, or five years. If the attacker  
            inflicted great bodily injury, the penalty could be enhanced  
            by three additional years in prison under current law. Is the  
            aggressive use of current law by prosecutors insufficient?
           

          Analysis Prepared by:    Geoff Long/ APPR. / (916) 319-2081